ZAGREB, March 11 (Hina) - Ruling coalition party benches in parliament on Tuesday applauded, while opposition parties vehemently criticised a government document on the reform of the judiciary, saying it was declarative and just
another document which the government is incapable of implementing and which will not improve the situation in the judiciary.
ZAGREB, March 11 (Hina) - Ruling coalition party benches in
parliament on Tuesday applauded, while opposition parties
vehemently criticised a government document on the reform of the
judiciary, saying it was declarative and just another document
which the government is incapable of implementing and which will
not improve the situation in the judiciary. #L#
The incumbent government had done nothing in the past three years,
the number of unsolved cases is accumulating and there are now two
million of them, claims the opposition.
The government will complete its term and the reform of the
judiciary will remain just another of its unfulfilled promises, the
Croatian Bloc's (HB) Ivic Pasalic said, claiming that the document
was "a good red herring" closely tied with coming elections.
Pasalic's statement about the appointment of ruling parties'
personnel in the judiciary caused a storm of reactions by coalition
partners who replied in the same manner, accusing him of a so-called
Pasalic commission having, during the reign of the Croatian
Democratic Union (HDZ), appointed party staff in the judiciary.
Four hundred judges were laid off and a true natural disaster
reigned over the judiciary, replied Ivan Ninic of the Social
Democrats (SDP), while Marin Jurjevic, of the same party, said that
a hundred people had been removed from the judiciary in Split
alone.
The opposition criticised the government for not having realised
its announcement about a permanent professional training of
judges, their overtime, and that little was done about promises
that the judiciary would be independent of politics.
Ruling coalition party benches commended the government's analysis
of the situation in the justice system, stating that it was a good
starting point for a radical reform of the judiciary and a better
legal protection of citizens.
(hina) lml sb