BELGRADE, May 3 (Hina) - A legal expert representing Yugoslavia in lawsuits Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina filed against Yugoslavia with the Hague-based International Court of Justice (ICJ) believes the court should be declared
unauthorised to conduct cases against Yugoslavia. Tibor Varadi, who is also a legal advisor to the Yugoslav foreign minister, told Belgrade's weekly NIN on Thursday his opinion was based on the fact that Yugoslavia had in the meantime become a full member of the United Nations. "Yugoslavia's admission to the U.N. puts the question of jurisdiction into a new context and gives us arguments to request that ICJ's jurisdiction be reconsidered," Varadi said. He recalled that on April 23 he had submitted such a request to the ICJ and that Bosnia-Herzegovina was expected to respond by September 30 this year. Asked which suit was more dangerous for Yugoslavia - Bosnia's or Croatia's,
BELGRADE, May 3 (Hina) - A legal expert representing Yugoslavia in
lawsuits Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina filed against Yugoslavia
with the Hague-based International Court of Justice (ICJ) believes
the court should be declared unauthorised to conduct cases against
Yugoslavia.
Tibor Varadi, who is also a legal advisor to the Yugoslav foreign
minister, told Belgrade's weekly NIN on Thursday his opinion was
based on the fact that Yugoslavia had in the meantime become a full
member of the United Nations.
"Yugoslavia's admission to the U.N. puts the question of
jurisdiction into a new context and gives us arguments to request
that ICJ's jurisdiction be reconsidered," Varadi said. He recalled
that on April 23 he had submitted such a request to the ICJ and that
Bosnia-Herzegovina was expected to respond by September 30 this
year.
Asked which suit was more dangerous for Yugoslavia - Bosnia's or
Croatia's, Varadi said the dispute with Bosnia had lasted for eight
years and some moves had been made "which significantly narrow the
manoeuvring space" of the Yugoslav legal team. As regards the
dispute with Croatia, "first serious moves are yet to be made," he
said.
The two disputes differ in the fact that in Croatia "most
destruction occurred before Croatia was recognised as an
independent country," he said.
Reminding that Yugoslavia has been sued "for the gravest act in the
penal code," Varadi said that if the court ruled that Yugoslavia
should pay war reparations, "this would seriously undermine the
prospects for economic revival and development in foreseeable
time."
"We probably would not be able to pay the debt, but the burden of the
debt would considerably affect our credit ability and
international economic position," he said.
/hina) rml