ZAGREB, Feb 28 (Hina) - Most party benches in the Croatian parliament on Friday opposed government-sponsored changes to the Labour Act, estimating that they would not help boost employment and the overall economic growth.
ZAGREB, Feb 28 (Hina) - Most party benches in the Croatian
parliament on Friday opposed government-sponsored changes to the
Labour Act, estimating that they would not help boost employment
and the overall economic growth. #L#
The Social Democrats (SDP) and Libra supported sending the bill
into parliamentary reading, the Liberal Party (LS), Social
Democrats (HSLS), Democratic Centre (DC) and the Croatian
Democratic Union (HDZ) advocated holding an introductory debate on
the bill, the Croatian Bloc (HB) and the Croatian Party of
Rights/Croatian Christian Democratic Union (HSP/HKDU) were
against the bill, while the Croatian Peasant Party (HSS) and the
Croatian People's Party (HNS) were undecided.
Most opposition parties as well as those from the ruling coalition
believe that workers' rights, severance pay and period of notice
are not an obstacle to economic growth and investments in Croatia,
and that changing the Labour Act should be preceded by establishing
a more efficient system of social protection for workers by
changing other social legislation.
Most benches urge an introductory debate in parliament so that the
social partners (government, unions, employers) could have more
time to reach a compromise about contentious issues.
The benches agreed that the Labour Act should be changed, but not by
restricting workers' rights, and objected to the fact that the bill
was forwarded into parliamentary procedure without the social
partners having reached a consensus first.
Labour Minister Davorko Vidovic said he was confident that the
social partners would reach agreement, adding that an introductory
debate was not necessary because it would only delay the adoption of
the law.
Vladimir Seks of the HDZ dismissed the government's claims that it
was changing the labour legislation because it was "rigid" and to
increase employment and reduce labour costs.
"The main reason for unemployment is not the rigidity of the
legislation but the government's false and unsuccessful economic
policy," he said.
The SDP bench believes that the social partners have already
reached agreement about some contentious issues and wants the
government to include the agreed regulations in the final bill,
which the parliament should start debating as soon as possible,
Mato Arlovic said.
However, the bill should be voted only after the adoption of changes
to other social laws, especially those defining deadlines for the
completion of labour disputes and the division of funds for social
protection regarding workers' restricted rights.
The SDP believes that temporary employment should be an exception
and that the labour act should clearly define in which cases it can
be applied as well as that it can last only three years. The party
also advocates the re-examination of the period of notice, i.e.
prolonging it and adjusting it to severance pay, Arlovic said.
The HSS opposes the parliament being given the role of an arbiter
between the social partners, Luka Trconic said, adding that changes
to the Labour Act were necessary but they should be in line with the
country's economic potential.
The Istrian Democratic Assembly (IDS) will support the proposed
changes only if they take effect when Croatia is admitted to the EU,
Damir Kajin said.
Ivic Pasalic of the HB considers it inadmissible to adjust labour
legislation with European standards without fighting corruption
and bribery, implementing the audit of privatisation and reforming
the judiciary first.
Anto Djapic of the HSP/HKDU bench believes that the bill is not the
result of a consensus between labour and capital but of compliance
with the requests of the World Bank and the International Monetary
Fund.
Vilim Herman of Libra supported the proposal that the bill be sent
into the first reading to prevent delaying its adoption.
Vesna Skare Ozbolt of the DC believes that the adoption of the bill
could cause instability as the government was imposing inadequate
solutions.
Vesna Pusic of the HNS/PGS/SBHS bench believes that the bill would
contribute to rendering the labour market more flexible on
condition the achieved macroeconomic trends are maintained.
(hina) rml