FILTER
Prikaži samo sadržaje koji zadovoljavaju:
objavljeni u periodu:
na jeziku:
hrvatski engleski
sadrže pojam:

JOVIC CONTINUES TESTIMONY IN MILOSEVIC TRIAL (1)

THE HAGUE/ZAGREB, Nov 19 (Hina) - Borisav Jovic, a member of the presidency of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) from 1989 to 1992 and long-time close aide to former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic, continued his testimony in the Milosevic trial before the UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague on Wednesday.
THE HAGUE/ZAGREB, Nov 19 (Hina) - Borisav Jovic, a member of the presidency of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) from 1989 to 1992 and long-time close aide to former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic, continued his testimony in the Milosevic trial before the UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague on Wednesday. #L# The chief prosecutor in the case, Geoffrey Nice, completed the examination of Jovic, including his book, "The Last Days of the SFRY", into the evidence file. The book contains portions that discredit Milosevic and the Serbian leadership. Responding to the prosecutor's questions, Jovic said that Milosevic's efforts at the 14th congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia (SKJ) Milosevic were aimed at breaking up the former Yugoslav federation. The witness confirmed that the rump Yugoslav presidency ordered the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) in 1991 "to protect" Serb-majority areas in Croatia. Footage was shown in the courtroom of JNA General Zivota Panic, commander of the 1st Army, saying that after the occupation of Vukovar in the autumn of 1991 the JNA's plan was to take Zagreb, but that Milosevic and Jovic rejected the plan and decided that only Serb-majority areas in Croatia should be protected. Jovic said that the SFRY presidency had not discussed PANIC's plan nor had it approved it. "The political position of the presidency was that the JNA should not be used to topple the Croatian government and occupy Croatia. Its position was that the JNA should stand between the Croatian paramilitary formations and the Serb territories until a political solution was found," he said. Prosecutor Nice quoted Jovic as saying in his book that in January 1991 Milosevic thought that "Croatia's secession should be accepted, but that Krajina should be held militarily" and that the JNA should "protect the borders of the new Yugoslavia". Asked how he explained the fact that the government in Serbia supported the right of the Serbs in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina to self-determination, while at the same time it denied this right to the ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, the witness said that the Serbs, as "a constituent people" in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, had this right unlike the Kosovo Albanians who are an ethnic minority. Asked to explain how this right was applied in the case of Dubrovnik or Eastern Slavonia, where the Serbs were in a minority, Jovic said that "there is no evidence of Serbia ever trying to impose Serbian authority on Dubrovnik." Jovic, who is testifying under a subpoena as a witness for the prosecution, was cited in the Milosevic indictment as one of the participants in "a joint criminal enterprise". His testimony is being monitored by his lawyer, Milan Vujin, for fear that he himself might be charged. (hina) vm sb

VEZANE OBJAVE

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙