BRDO KOD KRANJA, Oct 13 (Hina) - A meeting of countries of the Adriatic-Ionian Initiative focusing on a number of projects for the protection of the sea and coast in the two areas ended at Brdo kod Kranja, Slovenia, on Monday. The
Croatian delegation managed to tone down one of the conclusions adopted at the meeting, which speaks about the unacceptability of unilateral moves regarding the ecological protection of the Adriatic, something Slovenia had insisted on.
BRDO KOD KRANJA, Oct 13 (Hina) - A meeting of countries of the
Adriatic-Ionian Initiative focusing on a number of projects for the
protection of the sea and coast in the two areas ended at Brdo kod
Kranja, Slovenia, on Monday. The Croatian delegation managed to
tone down one of the conclusions adopted at the meeting, which
speaks about the unacceptability of unilateral moves regarding the
ecological protection of the Adriatic, something Slovenia had
insisted on. #L#
Slovenia's Environment Minister Janez Kopac said at a news
conference after the meeting that the meeting itself did not
address Croatia's decision to declare a protected zone in the
Adriatic, but he reiterated that Slovenia considered the decision
as a unilateral move unacceptable and that the environmental
protection of the sea and coastal area was possible only through
cooperation among all countries in the Adriatic-Ionian area.
"Slovenia opposes unilateral moves because environmental
protection can be implemented only through co-ordinated joint
action, and any unilateral action in that sense can have negative
consequences for the environment," Kopac said when asked how
Slovenia viewed Croatia's decision to declare a protected zone in
the Adriatic, which will go into force in a year's time.
He added that he was not acquainted with reports that Italy had
shelved the issue of Croatia's fishing and ecological zone in the
Adriatic and added that Slovenia and Italy were still adjusting
their actions with regard to that matter in the European Union.
The Slovene minister said that Croatia, too, had agreed to drawing
up a study on possible adverse effects of ballast water before the
construction of an oil terminal at Omisalj, given that all Adriatic
countries might be affected by ballast water.
Kopac said ballast water could be released only at places where the
sea was at least 120 metres deep, which was one of the reasons which
called for co-ordinated measures of environmental protection.
(hina) rml sb