( Editorial: --> 3644 )
ZAGREB, Sept 28 (Hina) - In five days the late Cardinal Alojzije
Stepinac will join the Catholic Church's most venerated figures
when Pope John Paul II will declare the former Zagreb Archbishop
blessed. His beatification will be a historic event in contemporary
times, but Stepinac was already the focus of world attention more
than 50 years ago, during his trial by the Communists.
Even during that most difficult period of his life, Stepinac had
received much support from the free world that went beyond the
Church and established him as a defender of freedom.
Stepinac's arrest and trial, carried out in 1946 by the former
Yugoslav Communist authorities, resulted in immediate debates and
harsh condemnations. The press at the time carried numerous
features.
The issue was discussed at the British House of Commons and the
Irish parliament in Dublin made a protest, while particularly harsh
reactions came from European intellectuals and writers, Catholic
bishops, pastors, and others.
The entire documentation was published in "Stepinac mu je ime"
("Stepinac Is His Name"), a collection of memoirs, testimonies and
documents published in 1991 by Krscanska Sadasnjost.
Winston Churchill told the British parliament on November 1, 1946
that the circumstances of Stepinac's trial and sentence had caused
widespread sorrow.
Author Francois Mauriac, a member of the French Academy, wrote in
"Le Figaro" on November 2, 1946 that claims about Stepinac's
collaboration with and assistance to the Ustasha were false.
On the contrary, Nobel winner Mauriac wrote that Stepinac never
stopped opposing the Ustasha. He publicly opposed the killing of
hostages and persecution of Jews.
According to historian Arnold J. Toynbee's 1953/54 monograph "The
Realignment of Europe", Stepinac had been accused of being
responsible for "crimes", whereas existing evidence showed he had
saved many lives.
Stepinac's relations with Ante Pavelic (head of the 1941-1945
Independent State of Croatia) had been interpreted in many ways and
arbitrarily, and thanks to the Communists, the worst
interpretations from the trial prevailed, Toynbee wrote.
American Jewish leader and head of the "American Jewish Committee"
programme, Louis S. Breir, said on October 13, 1946 that Stepinac
was a great man of the Church, who had been accused of being a Nazi
collaborator.
Breir said the Jews denied that and knew that from 1934 onwards
Stepinac had been a genuine friend of the Jews, at that time the
victims of persecution by Hitler and his servants.
Stepinac was one of the few in Europe to rise against Nazi tyranny at
a time when that was a dangerous thing to do. A victim of a shameful
trial, Stepinac openly and fearlessly spoke against the racist
Nuremberg legislation during the Nazi regime, and his opposition to
Nazi terror had never yielded, Breir said.
According to Breir, Archbishop Stepinac had been the best advocate
of persecuted Jews in Europe after Pope Pius XII.
New York's "The New Leader" wrote on October 12, 1946 that when the
Nazis occupied Croatia, Stepinac had risked his life to help the
Jews.
According to the paper, Stepinac had succeeded in having the order
for Jews to wear yellow insignia revoked, condemned the Nazi racial
law, cooperated with the international Red Cross to save Jews in
other countries, and hid Jews under his own roof, a practice also
carried out by many of his priests.
"The New York Times" assessed that the Stepinac trial had been a
purely political process with a pre-determined sentence.
Stepinac has been tried and will be imprisoned as part of a campaign
against his Church which is guilty of being an enemy of Communism,
the paper had written.
Ante Sumanovic told the "Neue Zuerische Zeitung" on November 20,
1947 about how in 1941 the Ustasha imprisoned him and Serb Orthodox
bishop Dositej, who told him that Stepinac had pleaded on Dositej's
behalf more than a brother could have done.
The bishop told Sumanovic that it was Stepinac's energetic attitude
which prevented the Ustasha from setting fire to and demolishing
the Orthodox church in Zagreb.
Thanks to Stepinac, the bishop was transferred to Serbia three days
later, while Sumanovic was taken to the Danica concentration camp
shortly afterwards.
Marc Petrovic wrote in "La Croix" on February 17, 1955 that
Stepinac's open and clear condemnation of the Ustasha and their
excesses was certain.
A strong person, Stepinac would always clearly state his opinion
and his criticisms, in relation to both Pavelic and Tito, or the
King himself, Petrovic had written.
(hina) ha jn/mbr
281605 MET sep 98
Francuska: Predsjednica parlamenta upozorava na rizik izglasavanja nepovjerenja vladi
Sabor: Raste broj članova dobrovoljnih mirovinskih fondova
MojPosao: "Lead developeri" lani s najvišim plaćama, najpotplaćeniji frizeri
Izrael optužio Hamas za odustajanje od dijelova sporazuma o primirju
AO: Sonego zaustavio brazilskog tinejdžera Fonsecu
U Križevcima će graditi zgradu Hrvatskog veterinarskog zavoda
ZSE: Crobexi dosegnuli nove rekordne razine, promet smanjen
U Kostreni novo onečišćenje mora
Trumpov kandidat za državnog tajnika Rubio potvrdio važnost NATO-a
Institut Vlado Gotovac skončao u stečaju i brisat će se iz registra