ZAGREB, April 27 (Hina) - The Croatian National Parliament's House of Representatives on Thursday adopted a draft law on the equal official usage of minorities' language and script in the country. The law was passed in the first
reading with a majority vote. One deputy was against it and 19 deputies of the HDZ, HSP and HKDU abstained during the vote. The Sabor's lower house also passed a draft law on reconstruction with a majority vote. The passage of the law on the official usage of a minority's language before state bodies would present a small step for Croatia but a great step for its all citizens and national minorities, since this removes artificial divisions between citizens of the first and second class, said Damir Kajin on behalf of the parliamentary bench of the Istrian Democratic Alliance (IDS). Kajin added that if this act had been adopted considerably earlier, t
ZAGREB, April 27 (Hina) - The Croatian National Parliament's House
of Representatives on Thursday adopted a draft law on the equal
official usage of minorities' language and script in the country.
The law was passed in the first reading with a majority vote. One
deputy was against it and 19 deputies of the HDZ, HSP and HKDU
abstained during the vote.
The Sabor's lower house also passed a draft law on reconstruction
with a majority vote.
The passage of the law on the official usage of a minority's
language before state bodies would present a small step for Croatia
but a great step for its all citizens and national minorities, since
this removes artificial divisions between citizens of the first and
second class, said Damir Kajin on behalf of the parliamentary bench
of the Istrian Democratic Alliance (IDS). Kajin added that if this
act had been adopted considerably earlier, this could have
prevented criticism from abroad that Croatia did not respect human
rights.
On behalf of the Croatian Social Liberal Party's (HSLS) bench,
Zrinjka Glovacki-Bernardi believed this passage could help Croatia
to improve its position in negotiations about the status of the
Croatian national minority in neighbouring countries, as now
Zagreb can cite its own law that is based on European standards.
However, Boris Kandare who spoke on behalf of the HSP-HKDU
(Croatian Party of Rights and Croatian Christian Democratic
Union), believed that this law did not match interests of the
Croatian people. He claimed that the issue of the official usage of
a national minority's language was precisely regulated by the
Constitutional Law and the adopted law differed considerably from
it. The HSP leader Anto Djapic agreed with him and added that some
provisions of the passed law might perhaps lead towards the
federalisation of Croatia.
Drago Krpina of the Croatian Democratic Party (HDZ) viewed the fact
that the law be applied in line with the 1991 census as
unacceptable, as, thus, demographic changes which happened in the
meantime were ignored.
Nevio Sestic said that for HDZ deputies it was unacceptable that the
official usage of a minority's language be also regulated at the
level of county, besides levels of cities, towns and
municipalities. For him, it is beyond the standards of the European
charter on regional and minorities' languages.
On behalf of the bench of national minorities, Furio Radin said
Croatia would like to integrate into Europe and therefore the
country is ahead of the Continent regarding the issue of
minorities' languages. It is absurd that it took six years to
discuss such normal request, Radin added.
On behalf of the bench of the LS and HNS (Liberal Party and Croatian
People's Party), Zlatko Kramaric said some debates had reflected an
irrational fear that this law could bring into question the
Constitution or even Croatia's independence and sovereignty. He
stressed that there was nothing to fear.
Katica Sedmak (the bench of Social Democratic Party, or SDP) agreed
with Kramaric, explaining that this law does not give anything to
anyone, as it is about human rights simply inseparable from each
man.
Despite many appeals for consensus about this law, HDZ, HSP and HKDU
deputies abstained during the vote.
At the request of the HDZ party, deputies voted individually (one by
one) on draft amendments to the Reconstruction Law. The law was
endorsed with a majority vote, while 28 were against it.
Those who opposed the law were deputies of the HDZ, HSP and HKDU
parties. During Wednesday's debate they said this law negated the
precedence of Croatian Homeland War veterans and their families'
members in the exercise of rights in reconstruction over other
returnees, and opposition parties' members claimed that this law
also equalised victims and the aggressor. This law stipulates that
all returnees, except from those convicted of war crimes, have the
right to the reconstruction of their property.
(hina) mm ms