ZAGREB, June 29 (Hina) - The president of the Social Liberals (HSLS), Drazen Budisa, said on Saturday the ruling five-party coalition still existed. He also stated that under the coalition's agreement, a party may be ousted from the
coalition, and added that this right was not contested.
ZAGREB, June 29 (Hina) - The president of the Social Liberals
(HSLS), Drazen Budisa, said on Saturday the ruling five-party
coalition still existed. He also stated that under the coalition's
agreement, a party may be ousted from the coalition, and added that
this right was not contested. #L#
Talking to reporters after a session of the HSLS Governing Council,
Budisa said this body unanimously supported the stand of the party
and its MPs against the ratification of a deal with Slovenia on the
Krsko nuclear power plant.
Budisa said the fact that the HSLS MPs had walked out of a
parliamentary session which was to vote on the ratification of the
deal did not mean the party was leaving the ruling coalition but
constituted a "move whereby the HSLS wanted to express its
disagreement with the moved deal and everything that had gone on
that day."
"As far as the HSLS is concerned, the five-party coalition stays,
but we are also open to other possibilities if this is our partners'
political will," said Budisa.
Asked if this meant the HSLS might cross over to the opposition, he
said "the HSLS has a long experience in the opposition," but added
he thought this would not happen. "And if it happened, it wouldn't
last long," he said.
Asked if a minority government, minus the HSLS, was possible, as the
vice president of the Social Democrats, Mato Arlovic, said on radio
earlier today, Budisa said he was not authorised to answer this
question as it was a matter which should be addressed by the HSLS
Governing Council, which this body did not do today.
Arlovic announced today that parliament would take another vote on
the ratification of the Krsko deal on Wednesday. By walking out
yesterday, the HSLS MPs prevented ratification by simple
majority.
The deal could not be voted on yesterday due to lack of quorum. Not
all MPs of the other four coalition parties were present, neither
were those of the opposition, which was against the deal.
In the meantime, the leaders of the five coalition parties held a
meeting which Budisa left early, claiming the issue was not the
ratification of a deal but relations within the coalition.
The leader of the Social Democrats (SDP), Prime Minister Ivica
Racan, said he was not sure the coalition existed anymore. He said
the other four partners considered the conduct of the HSLS
absolutely inadmissible. Racan urged the partners to take a clear
stand regarding the fate and make-up of the coalition.
The HSLS maintains the ratification of the Krsko deal is not an
issue which should break up the coalition. The party's
representatives say they will not leave the coalition of their own
will, but that the partners may oust them.
The other four parties maintain the HSLS should leave the coalition
as a logical course of events after their refusal to ratify the
Krsko deal. The only alternative is a minority government or early
elections, they say.
The possibility of early elections has been mentioned
unofficially, as was that of taking a parliamentary vote of no
confidence in Budisa as deputy prime minister, with the explanation
that he obstructed the government's decision on the ratification of
the Krsko deal.
Budisa today refuted PM Racan's claims that he had been notified in
advance that the prosecution of the Hague-based UN war crimes
tribunal wanted the transcript of a conversation between Budisa and
former Croatian President Franjo Tudjman. Budisa said he learned
about this less than an hour before a government session.
Looking through the document which was shown to him by Racan and his
assistant Goran Granic, Budisa said he saw his name on a list of
documents wanted by the UN tribunal. He said he did not know when the
government had been notified about the tribunal's request.
Asked what was contentious in the wanted transcript and why the
tribunal wanted it, Budisa said the document "contains nothing
which should be of interest to the prosecution, since neither I nor
Tudjman are criminals."
(hina) ha sb