ZAGREB, Sept 28 (Hina) - Attorney Branko Seric on Tuesday requested the Zagreb County Court panel of judges to acquit his client Dinko Sakic, the commander of the Ustashi concentration camp of Jasenovac, indicted for war crime against
the civilian population. The defence claims the prosecution has failed to prove Sakic's guilt.
ZAGREB, Sept 28 (Hina) - Attorney Branko Seric on Tuesday requested
the Zagreb County Court panel of judges to acquit his client Dinko
Sakic, the commander of the Ustashi concentration camp of
Jasenovac, indicted for war crime against the civilian
population.
The defence claims the prosecution has failed to prove Sakic's
guilt. #L#
"Sakic can be criticised and morally condemned for his ideological
affiliation, but he cannot be not convicted for that. We are not
trying a man for his ideas, but for what he has done", said Seric
requesting that the panel of judges study the court file in an
objective and unbiased manner and acquit Sakic.
"This is the first such case in the Croatian court practice. You
have the honour and responsibility, but don't play God", Seric
warned.
Seric believes the subject matter of the trial is not to answer what
the Jasenovac camp was, but to establish the individual
responsibility of his client for acts he is charged with. "If the
court has any doubts about the accusations against the defendant,
it must acquit him", he stressed.
Seric recalled that as a 13-year-old boy, Sakic had been expelled
from his high school and his hometown of Slavonski Brod, which
determined his life path as a Croat nationalist. "Upon joining the
Ustashi movement, Sakic pledged to fight for the creation of the
Independent State of Croatia (NDH), and he pledged his unreserved
obedience to Ante Pavelic, who became the absolute master of
Sakic's life and death", Seric said.
"The NDH had the attributes of a state. It had authorities, laws,
bodies, and territory, on which camps were established. Defendant
Sakic found himself in that system and he had to carry out orders in
the system of subordination", Seric said, adding his client only
headed and was not the "actual commander" of the camp.
He then quoted the curator of the Jasenovac museum, Jelka Smreka,
who said that Sakic had only been a puppet. Sakic cannot be
convicted only because of the fact that he was the camp's head,
Seric said.
He expressed doubt regarding the authenticity of witness
statements, adding they contradicted each other. Commenting on the
accusation that Sakic was guilty of hard physical labour, and the
starvation and torture of prisoners, Seric cited statements by some
witnesses saying that "moreover, Sakic made the camp regime less
severe". Seric also refuted the accusation that during Sakic's
command of the camp sick prisoners and those unfit for work were
executed.
According to Seric, the claim by witness Milos Despot that Sakic
shot dead a prisoner who had stolen a corn cob, contradicts the
statement by witness Zdenko Schwartz, from Israel, who accused
Ljubo Milos of that murder.
Commenting on the accusation that Sakic was guilty of the death of
an unknown number of prisoners, who were killed in the so-called
"hunting game" in which Sakic also participated by shooting at
inmates from the window of the command building, Seric said no
witness but Schwartz mentioned that incident.
Speaking about the material evidence, Seric said the documents of
the National Commission for Establishing Crimes of the Occupying
Forces and Their Collaborators could not be treated as evidence
because the Commission was a political body governed by political
goals.
Statements by expert witnesses have helped only in creating the
overall picture, but not in proving Sakic's guilt, he said.
He added that many public figures in Croatia and abroad had
equalised Sakic's objective responsibility with that of the
Croatian state, and attempts to differentiate between those two
kinds of responsibility were declared the continuation of the
fascist tradition.
"We, the defenders, have also been criticised that we identify
ourselves with the client, although we only perform our duties
professionally", said Seric, commenting on some media claims
which, he said, denied legitimacy to the court proceedings due to
the fact that Sakic had not been indicted for genocide.
The Sakic trial continues on Wednesday, when the defendant will
present his closing argument.
(hina) jn rml