ZAGREB, Sept 1 (Hina) - The final hearing on the occasion of the request of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia for the extradition of Mladen Naletilic Tuta was held at the Zagreb County Court on Wednesday.
The panel of judges will notify all interested parties about their ruling by letter. At today's hearing, representatives of the defence and the prosecution presented their closing arguments, while an expert witness testified about the defendant's health condition. Defence attorney Vjekoslav Krsnik suggested that the panel of judges return the indictment to the ICTY Prosecutor's Office so that it may specify the defendant's accountability for each crime mentioned. "The indictment is based on criteria of objective accountability, which is impermissible given that Croatia's judiciary has not been given the possibility to judge if these are criminal acts which according
ZAGREB, Sept 1 (Hina) - The final hearing on the occasion of the
request of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former
Yugoslavia for the extradition of Mladen Naletilic Tuta was held at
the Zagreb County Court on Wednesday.
The panel of judges will notify all interested parties about their
ruling by letter.
At today's hearing, representatives of the defence and the
prosecution presented their closing arguments, while an expert
witness testified about the defendant's health condition.
Defence attorney Vjekoslav Krsnik suggested that the panel of
judges return the indictment to the ICTY Prosecutor's Office so
that it may specify the defendant's accountability for each crime
mentioned.
"The indictment is based on criteria of objective accountability,
which is impermissible given that Croatia's judiciary has not been
given the possibility to judge if these are criminal acts which
according to The Hague tribunal's statute fall under its
jurisdiction," Krsnik said.
With an indictment so formulated, the tribunal's Prosecutor's
Office has exceeded its authority, by prejudging guilt and relying
on the criterion of objective accountability, he added.
Zagreb County State Attorney Marija Jambor said all legal
conditions of the Constitutional Law on Croatia's cooperation with
the ICTY have been met with regard to Tuta's extradition.
The ICTY indictment charges Tuta with crimes against humanity
committed on Bosnian territory between April 1993 and January 1994
as the commander of a so called prisoners' battalion, with serious
violations of Geneva conventions, and violations of the law and
customs of war.
Tuta said he understood the indictment, but that he did not feel
guilty on any count. He said he was "guilty if to defend the Homeland
is a crime."
Expert physician Anton Smalcelj said the defendant suffers from
angina pectoris. Tuta was not able to attend trial for some time due
to poor health and the risk of heart attack. The defendant is better
now and has been allowed to stand trial, even though he has been
advised to undergo treatment in a civil hospital, Smalcelj said.
In his closing argument, Tuta's defence said the ICTY Prosecutor's
Office has violated articles six and seven of the tribunal's
statute.
"By including in the indictment alleged actions on the part of
Croatian Army units on BH territory, an allusion is being made to
the possible accountability of Croatia for actions for which only a
person can be held accountable, and this is impermissible according
to regulations of The Hague tribunal's Statute," he said.
Krsnik said it would be logical for the trial against Tuta in
Croatia to be completed first, given that the crimes for which The
Hague tribunal is competent have no statute of limitations.
The Zagreb County State Attorney's Office has not yet made a
decision relative to the defendant's request of March 30 that the
crimes which are the subject of the ICTY indictment be processed in
Croatia. Krsnik believes Tuta's extradition cannot be considered
before the decision has been made.
"The Croatian judiciary would conduct a speedy and efficient trial,
and proceedings would be over before a first hearing in The Hague
were organised," Krsnik said. He suggested that the panel of judges
adopt the defence proposal and turn down The Hague tribunal's
demand.
Krsnik will appeal to the Supreme Court if his proposal is
rejected.
(hina) ha