ZAGREB, April 22 (Hina) - Croatia's Constitutional Court on Thursday ruled that foreigners whose property had been confiscated during the Communist times were also entitled to the compensation. At Thursday's session, the
Constitutional Court revoked seven provisions of the law on the compensation for the confiscated property during the Yugoslav Communist rule under which only Croatian citizens had the right to get compensation for impounded assets. The Court revoked the provisions, but its ruling has not yet come into effects. The Court gave a one-year period to lawmakers to regulate this matter by acts. The Court refused a proposal to assess whether the entire law was in conformity with the Constitution. The Croatian Constitution has no provisions on de-nationalisation or on the compensation for the confiscated property. Furthermore, there are no international legal obligations for states to ret
ZAGREB, April 22 (Hina) - Croatia's Constitutional Court on
Thursday ruled that foreigners whose property had been confiscated
during the Communist times were also entitled to the compensation.
At Thursday's session, the Constitutional Court revoked seven
provisions of the law on the compensation for the confiscated
property during the Yugoslav Communist rule under which only
Croatian citizens had the right to get compensation for impounded
assets.
The Court revoked the provisions, but its ruling has not yet come
into effects. The Court gave a one-year period to lawmakers to
regulate this matter by acts.
The Court refused a proposal to assess whether the entire law was in
conformity with the Constitution. The Croatian Constitution has no
provisions on de-nationalisation or on the compensation for the
confiscated property. Furthermore, there are no international
legal obligations for states to return the seized property, the
Court said explaining its ruling.
During the discussion it was said that none of countries in
transition, which were legally regulating and conducting the de-
nationalisation, had economic possibilities to return in kind all
the confiscated property and to make amends for all negative
consequences of the previous confiscation.
All laws and thus the law on the compensation include the
fundamental assumption that one should not cause new and more
grievous injustice by redressing the old one. The law is the result
of compromise and the encounter of the opposite rights and
interests of the former owners and holders of the right vested on
the confiscated property.
It was said the Constitutional Court could not evaluate the
economic strength of the state and how and to which extent the
confiscated property should be either compensated or returned.
The Court maintained that the it was in the jurisdiction of the
Croatian National Parliament (Sabor) to decide on the compensation
and the return of the confiscated property.
(hina) jn ms