ZAGREB, March 11 (Hina) - The main purpose of changes to the Distress Law is to speed up the bankruptcy procedure, which would eliminate from economic and legal transactions those legal entities who are not able to operate, meet their
financial obligations and are insolvent. These goals of the proposed changes to the Distress Law were endorsed at a session of the Croatian National Sabor's House of Representatives on Thursday. Most objections by the MPs were, however, related to the state, ministries and the Government being the greatest debtors. The state, ministries and the Government cannot file for bankruptcy and that problem should be solved, said Petar Zitnik of the Croatian Peasants' Party (HSS) bench. He also welcomed the acceleration of the bankruptcy procedure. At the end of last year, about 26,500 firms, with some 180,000 employees, were blocked and their unpaid financial obligations amounted to about U
ZAGREB, March 11 (Hina) - The main purpose of changes to the
Distress Law is to speed up the bankruptcy procedure, which would
eliminate from economic and legal transactions those legal
entities who are not able to operate, meet their financial
obligations and are insolvent.
These goals of the proposed changes to the Distress Law were
endorsed at a session of the Croatian National Sabor's House of
Representatives on Thursday.
Most objections by the MPs were, however, related to the state,
ministries and the Government being the greatest debtors. The
state, ministries and the Government cannot file for bankruptcy and
that problem should be solved, said Petar Zitnik of the Croatian
Peasants' Party (HSS) bench. He also welcomed the acceleration of
the bankruptcy procedure.
At the end of last year, about 26,500 firms, with some 180,000
employees, were blocked and their unpaid financial obligations
amounted to about US $2.27 billion. However, the proposed changes
are not a solution to the problem of illiquidity, said Anto Tukic of
the Liberal Party (LS). The main cause of insolvency is the lack of
money and the state as the greatest debtor, he said.
Hrvoje Kraljevic of the Croatian Social Liberal Party (HSLS) bench
supported Tukic's claim by mentioning the example of faculties,
which were not paying any utilities but only salaries, which was the
only thing they did get money for from the Science Ministry.
The state finances are collapsing, said Damir Kajin of the Istrian
Democratic Assembly (IDS). Kajin said he believed that the whole
system, including the distress bill, was aimed at "making it
through to the elections, and what happens later does not matter".
He supported the part of the bill enabling employees to initiate the
bankruptcy procedure against their employer for not paying
salaries and other obligations. Kajin added that 150,000 workers
have not been receiving salaries for months.
One has to take care of employees when applying the Distress Law,
because workers cannot be guilty of bankruptcy, said Djuro Njavro
of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ). Supporting the changes to
the law, Njavro believed the establishment of a normal economic
environment was a top priority.
Mato Arlovic of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) warned of a
regulation enabling State Attorney's offices to submit proposals,
on behalf of the Republic of Croatia, counties and the City of
Zagreb, for initiating bankruptcy procedures against debtors who
are not fulfilling their financial obligations. If bankruptcy
procedures are to be initiated in such a manner, there is no way to
avoid discretion, which is very dangerous for equality in the
market, he added.
The MPs were often referring to the problem of bills of exchange and
their payment with a discount of merely 20 per cent. The state has
issued one billion worth of bills of exchange, Damir Kajin said
wondering whether the state would be able to fulfil its obligation.
Suggestions for solving the problem of insolvency, such as
multilateral compensation, could be heard throughout today's
discussion.
The MPs also spoke about the need to impose stricter criteria for
trustees, who, along with high professional training, would have to
pass a specialist exam. The Lower House also suggested that someone
can be a trustee in one, possibly two, but not several firms.
(hina) rml