ZAGREB, Mar 11 (Hina) - The Croatian Justice Ministry has obtained bills proving that in the period between June 11, 1997 and January 25, 2000, Croatia paid US attorney David Rivkin US$9,068,104 and 30 cent, Justice Minister Stjepan
Ivanisevic told reporters on Saturday. "Those bills refer to his services as a state agent representing Croatia before the International Court of Justice, where Croatia submitted a claim against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia for genocide, and for his interventions as an observer in the Kordic-Cerkez case before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)," Ivanisevic said. Asked who had signed such a contract with Rivkin, Ivanisevic said he still had not seen the contract. "The contract Croatia signed with Rivkin is at the Croatian Embassy in the United States, but we still have not seen it. Until I see it, I cannot say who is responsible for
ZAGREB, Mar 11 (Hina) - The Croatian Justice Ministry has obtained
bills proving that in the period between June 11, 1997 and January
25, 2000, Croatia paid US attorney David Rivkin US$9,068,104 and 30
cent, Justice Minister Stjepan Ivanisevic told reporters on
Saturday.
"Those bills refer to his services as a state agent representing
Croatia before the International Court of Justice, where Croatia
submitted a claim against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia for
genocide, and for his interventions as an observer in the Kordic-
Cerkez case before the International Criminal Tribunal for the
former Yugoslavia (ICTY)," Ivanisevic said.
Asked who had signed such a contract with Rivkin, Ivanisevic said he
still had not seen the contract.
"The contract Croatia signed with Rivkin is at the Croatian Embassy
in the United States, but we still have not seen it. Until I see it, I
cannot say who is responsible for it," Ivanisevic said, adding
Rivkin was invited to visit Croatia.
The US attorney should visit Croatia at the end of next week to
submit a report on his work and bills that have been paid, and to
return documents Croatia had given him.
Ivanisevic added that he knew about the existence of "other
channels through which Rivkin was paid, such as the Defence
Ministry and the community of Herceg-Bosna."
Reporters were especially interested in documents related to the
case of Tihomir Blaskic. Ivanisevic said he knew about the
documents from the moment they were discovered at the Croatian
Intelligence Service's (HIS) archive.
According to Ivanisevic, those documents include "documents from
the Croatian Defence Council (HVO) archive, some documents
belonging to the Army of Bosnia-Herzegovina which were seized
during the war, and documents about some Serb units."
The documents also include Blaskic's operative diary in which it is
visible that he had ordered an investigation into the Ahmici crime.
However, he was not satisfied with the first report and ordered
another investigation, but he never received the second report,
Ivanisevic said.
The statement of ICTY Trial Chamber President Claude Jorda that
"Blaskic did nothing is not true because the defence did not have
those documents at their disposal."
"It has been agreed that the documents be submitted to the defence
and Tribunal but a procedure must be conducted in Croatia before
that," the minister said.
Speaking about Mladen Naletilic Tuta, Ivanisevic said he requested
the ICTY to organise a hearing (the reading of the indictment and
the defendant's plea) before an ICTY trial chamber in Zagreb and
that Tuta remain in custody in Croatia until the beginning of the
trial.
Since the ICTY has a large number of cases, one expected that the
request would be judged as rational because it would cost the
Tribunal less and Tuta's health would not be put at risk, Ivanisevic
said. However, the proposal was not accepted and we are now
expecting a request for Naletilic's hand-over, Ivanisevic said,
adding once the Tribunal reached the decision, he would have to
annul the decision on the postponement of extradition proceedings
and extradite Naletilic.
Ivanisevic also said he believed "the events in Croatia after the
announcement of Blaskic's sentence and some reactions have had a
significant impact on the Tribunal's decision."
Answering about Croatia's future cooperation with the ICTY,
Ivanisevic said Croatia would continue paying the costs of the
defence of general Blaskic.
As regards the Kordic-Cerkez case, which Croatia co-finances and
observes, Ivanisevic said this "still has to be discussed."
As regards the ICJ, Ivanisevic said he would request that Rivkin be
relieved of his duties as Croatia's state agent and suggest another
agent.
Croatia has sought an extension of the deadline for submitting its
claim against Yugoslavia before the ICJ, and it has been granted an
extension until September this year, Ivanisevic said.
(hina) rml