FILTER
Prikaži samo sadržaje koji zadovoljavaju:
objavljeni u periodu:
na jeziku:
hrvatski engleski
sadrže pojam:

CRO AND YUGOSLAV REPS. MEET BEFORE ICJ ABOUT CROATIA'S APPLICATION

THE HAGUE, Sept 13 (Hina) - Legal representatives of the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) on Monday held their first working meeting with the President of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in the ICJ offices in The Hague to discuss a further procedure after Croatia filed an application with this Court on instituting proceedings against Belgrade for genocide.
THE HAGUE, Sept 13 (Hina) - Legal representatives of the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) on Monday held their first working meeting with the President of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in the ICJ offices in The Hague to discuss a further procedure after Croatia filed an application with this Court on instituting proceedings against Belgrade for genocide.#L# At the meeting with the ICJ President, American Stephen Schwebel, both Croatia and Yugoslavia said they would need six months to prepare court depositions. Croatia was represented by Justice Minister Zvonimir Separovic, a U.S. lawyer David Rivkin and Croatia's Ambassador Jaksa Muljacic. Croatia will first expound its application and submit evidence for accusing Yugoslavia of having violating the Genocide Convention. Thereafter Yugoslavia can respond to documents given by Zagreb and even submit a counterclaim. On Monday, Yugoslav representatives already announced they would submit the counterclaim, said Minister Separovic after the meeting, adding the strength of arguments was on his country's side. On July 2, this year, Croatia lodged the application with the Hague- based ICJ accusing Yugoslavia of having committed genocide between 1991 and 1995. Croatia expects from this top judicial body of the United Nations to issue a verdict that Yugoslavia committed genocide in Croatia and that it should pay reparations. Croatia explained its suit saying that by directly controlling the activity of its armed forces, intelligence agents and various paramilitary units on the territory of the Republic of Croatia, in the Knin area, eastern and western Slavonia and Dalmatia, the FRY is liable for the "ethnic cleansing" of Croatian citizens from aforementioned areas. Croatia has also accused Belgrade of the ethnic cleansing of Serbs following the operations "Flash" and "Storm". According to Croatia's application, Belgrade directed, encouraged and urged Croatian citizens of Serb ethnicity in the Knin region to evacuate the area in 1995, despite Croatian authorities' assurances that local Serbs had nothing to fear and should stay. The Genocide Convention was violated with the occupation of one third of the Croatian territory, which left over 20,000 killed citizens, more than 120 mass graves, 55,000 wounded, 3,000 missing people and caused direct damage amounting to US$27 billion, according to the application of Zagreb. The Genocide Convention, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1948, defines genocide as activities aimed at destroying, in whole or in part, a national ethnic, racial or religious group. For Croatia the proceedings are legally and historically grounded... This is the consequence of what happened in Croatia from 1991 to 1995 when an aggression was launched, war waged and violence committed against Croatia while it struggled for its independence, Separovic said after Monday's meeting. We believe and have great chances to prove and we shall do our best to prove that we suffered from genocide and aggression against Croatia and the Croatian people, the minister added. "As of today for Croatia yet another court works in The Hague. This court is for us absolutely affirmative as it starts from the position of Croatia as a victim," the Croatian minister said. The ICJ, the top UN judicial body, was constituted after World War Two to settle disputes between states. Parties in a dispute can only be countries and not institutions or individuals. Asked about Croatia's chances to receive reparations from Belgrade, Separovic replied that "moral condemnation of the aggressor is more important" for his country. (hina) jn ms

VEZANE OBJAVE

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙