THE HAGUE, Dec 15 (Hina) - Prosecutors with the Hague war crimes tribunal on Friday requested life sentences for a former vice-president of the Croat Community of Herzeg-Bosnia, Dario Kordic, and a former commander of the Vitez
brigade, Mario Cerkez, who are charged with war crimes in the areas of Herzeg-Bosnia (Kordic) and Vitez (Cerkez). The prosecution believes that life sentences are adequate, Geoffrey Nice, prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia (ICTY), said upon the completion of the summation by Kordic's defence. Defence attorneys for the former vice-president of the Croat Community of Herzeg-Bosnia previously called on the trial chamber to acquit their client of any guilt, as, they said, the prosecution had failed to prove he was guilty. He should be acquitted because he is not guilty, defence attorney Stephen Sayers said. According to Sayers, the prosecution
THE HAGUE, Dec 15 (Hina) - Prosecutors with the Hague war crimes
tribunal on Friday requested life sentences for a former vice-
president of the Croat Community of Herzeg-Bosnia, Dario Kordic,
and a former commander of the Vitez brigade, Mario Cerkez, who are
charged with war crimes in the areas of Herzeg-Bosnia (Kordic) and
Vitez (Cerkez).
The prosecution believes that life sentences are adequate,
Geoffrey Nice, prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunal
for former Yugoslavia (ICTY), said upon the completion of the
summation by Kordic's defence.
Defence attorneys for the former vice-president of the Croat
Community of Herzeg-Bosnia previously called on the trial chamber
to acquit their client of any guilt, as, they said, the prosecution
had failed to prove he was guilty.
He should be acquitted because he is not guilty, defence attorney
Stephen Sayers said.
According to Sayers, the prosecution has failed to prove the high
degree of Kordic's control as a civilian which is necessary for the
establishment of his liability for crimes committed by his
subordinates. Sayers recalled judgements by the International
tribunal for crimes committed in Rwanda which define such control
as the implementation of clear and final control both de iure and de
facto, over any attacker who committed a crime.
Kordic's other defence attorney Turner Smith said Croats in central
Bosnia had not persecuted Muslims on ethnic grounds but carried out
defence operations.
Persecution is an elastic concept with a high threshold which must
be reached with evidence and the prosecution has failed to do it,
Smith said. What happened between the two ethnic groups is a matter
of politics and not criminal liability, the US attorney said.
The crimes in Ahmici or Stupni Dol do not constitute wide-spread and
systematic persecution but are ad hoc crimes, Turner said
contesting the prosecution's assessment that what happened in
central Bosnia was ethnic cleansing.
The reality of that area is that more than 100,000 Croats were
expelled and it is therefore not true that Croats persecuted
Muslims but Muslims persecuted Croats, Smith said recalling that
100,000 Croats had been expelled from central Bosnia while the
others remained squeezed in four enclaves.
That is a reality history will record, he said.
Defence attorney Mitko Naumovski said his client had had no
military or civilian powers.
Kordic was not in the position to make important, strategic
decisions nor did he hold any military or administrative offices of
the highest rank, he said.
Kordic's orders to the artillery in January and February of 1993
were a consequence of the 'confused situation' in the Busovaca
area, Naumovski said.
The defence is concerned that their client has been exposed to a
media campaign over the past years and that "conspiracy against the
tribunal", including defence attorneys from some other cases and
Croatian state officials, is at work, he said.
Cerkez's defence attorneys said in their summation the prosecution
had failed to prove that the Vitez brigade had ever been in Ahmici
and taken part in the crime in which over a hundred Muslim civilians
were killed on April 16, 1993.
The defendant cannot be responsible for crimes committed by other
parts of the Croat Defence Council (HVO) in 1992 and 1993 just
because he was an HVO commander, attorney Bozo Kovacic said.
There is barely any direct evidence and too much circumstantial
evidence, Kovacic added.
Presenting their summation on Thursday, the prosecution told the
trial chamber Kordic and Cerkez had had decisive influence on the
policy and attacks which led to ethnic cleansing in Central
Bosnia.
Their case was corroborated by new evidence which came from an HVO
archive the new Croatian authorities made available for the Hague
prosecution in May this year.
The materials include Kordic's orders to the commander of the
Central Bosnia Operative Zone Tihomir Blaskic in the days of the
fiercest attacks in April 1993 to, for example, "send back up" or
"close the circle", and Blaskic's order to Cerkez to "take Donja
Veceriska, Ahmici, Sibrino selo and Vrhovina."
Kordic and Blaskic received feedback about progress on the ground
whereas Kordic and the commander of the Ahmici military police,
Pasko Ljubicic, were directly connected, the prosecutor said.
The materials also include Cerkez's report to Blaskic of April 16
1993, confirming that the village of "Ahmici has been finished
70%," or documents on a meeting between Kordic and local leaders on
the day before the Ahmici massacre, which show that Kordic was
requested to postpone the attack on Ahmici.
(hina) rml