ZAGREB, June 23 (Hina) - The head of the Croatian judges' association, Vladimir Gredelj, described draft amendments and supplements to the Courts' Law as utterly unacceptable. Those amendments have been drafted by a working group led
by Croatian Justice Minister Stjepan Ivanisevic. According to an open letter, written by Gredelj, the draft act on amendments was not in compliance with the Constitutional principle on the division of authorities, independence of the judiciary and relevant international acts. Justice Minister proposed such an act that he could ask from the Croatian national parliament to make it possible for him "to get the status of 'Pharaoh' at the top of the pyramid of the judicial authorities," Gredelj said. Under the minister's proposal, Justice Minister will appoint the court's presidents, launch procedures for their impeachment, ensure evidence and d
ZAGREB, June 23 (Hina) - The head of the Croatian judges'
association, Vladimir Gredelj, described draft amendments and
supplements to the Courts' Law as utterly unacceptable.
Those amendments have been drafted by a working group led by
Croatian Justice Minister Stjepan Ivanisevic.
According to an open letter, written by Gredelj, the draft act on
amendments was not in compliance with the Constitutional principle
on the division of authorities, independence of the judiciary and
relevant international acts.
Justice Minister proposed such an act that he could ask from the
Croatian national parliament to make it possible for him "to get the
status of 'Pharaoh' at the top of the pyramid of the judicial
authorities," Gredelj said.
Under the minister's proposal, Justice Minister will appoint the
court's presidents, launch procedures for their impeachment,
ensure evidence and decide on relieving somebody from duty and so
on.
In addition, the minister's decision and decree is final which
implies that nobody can re-consider it in a regular procedure.
According to the letter, the amendments would allow that the
minister can do everything but nobody can do anything against his
decisions.
For Gredelj, it is also indicative that the Minister Ivanisevic has
failed to mention criteria under which he would appoint or replace
courts' presidents. On the other hand, the Minister cited a lack of
criteria for the appointment of judges by the State Judicial
Council as the main argument for giving the negative mark to the
work of this judicial body.
(hina) jn ms