ZAGREB, Feb 15 (Hina) - Parliament's House of Representatives resumed its tenth session on Thursday by debating a new set of conclusions drafted in connection with the case of retired general Mirko Norac. The conclusions have been
drafted by the benches of the ruling coalition's six parties, the PGS/SBHS (Primorje-Gorski Kotar Alliance/Croatian Party of Slavonia and Baranja) bench and the bench of minority representatives. The ruling coalition benches yesterday withdrew an initial set of conclusions which, among else, took to task the organisers of last weekend's protests in support of Norac for planning a coup. Norac is a suspect in 1991's war crimes against civilians. The issuing of an arrest warrant earlier last week elicited a series of protest rallies in several parts of the country. The new conclusions demand compliance with provisions from a declaration on the Homeland Defence War, Croatia'
ZAGREB, Feb 15 (Hina) - Parliament's House of Representatives
resumed its tenth session on Thursday by debating a new set of
conclusions drafted in connection with the case of retired general
Mirko Norac.
The conclusions have been drafted by the benches of the ruling
coalition's six parties, the PGS/SBHS (Primorje-Gorski Kotar
Alliance/Croatian Party of Slavonia and Baranja) bench and the
bench of minority representatives.
The ruling coalition benches yesterday withdrew an initial set of
conclusions which, among else, took to task the organisers of last
weekend's protests in support of Norac for planning a coup. Norac is
a suspect in 1991's war crimes against civilians. The issuing of an
arrest warrant earlier last week elicited a series of protest
rallies in several parts of the country.
The new conclusions demand compliance with provisions from a
declaration on the Homeland Defence War, Croatia's early 1990s war
of independence from the ex-Yugoslavia, adopted by parliament last
autumn, including the one stipulating that the Croatian judiciary
is obliged to prosecute all possible cases of individual war crimes
by applying principles of individual accountability and guilt.
The conclusions also support the head of state, the government, and
judicial institutions in executing their powers, and bind the
government and competent state bodies to act in line with the
Constitution and legislation in preventing activities which could
endanger the basic values of the constitutional order.
(hina) ha