ZAGREB, March 6 (Hina) - The Croatian parliament on Wednesday debated a bill on secret services. According to the draft law, Croatia would have three secret services, two civilian and one military. The bill would establish an
Intelligence Service (OA), a Counter-Intelligence Service (POA) and a Military Intelligence Service (VOA). The VOA would have jusrisdiction abroad during peace-time, but otherwise work for the Defence Ministry and Croatian Armed Forces. The draft law stipulates the founding of a secret service supervisory body functioning at the National Security Council and the Croatian parliament. Deputy Premier Goran Granic said the intelligence services will not overstep the authority of police, while cooperation of civilians with the services is voluntary. If force is needed, the secret services will have to call the police, Granic said. Secret services in the past years caused dissatisfaction among citi
ZAGREB, March 6 (Hina) - The Croatian parliament on Wednesday
debated a bill on secret services. According to the draft law,
Croatia would have three secret services, two civilian and one
military.
The bill would establish an Intelligence Service (OA), a Counter-
Intelligence Service (POA) and a Military Intelligence Service
(VOA). The VOA would have jusrisdiction abroad during peace-time,
but otherwise work for the Defence Ministry and Croatian Armed
Forces.
The draft law stipulates the founding of a secret service
supervisory body functioning at the National Security Council and
the Croatian parliament.
Deputy Premier Goran Granic said the intelligence services will not
overstep the authority of police, while cooperation of civilians
with the services is voluntary.
If force is needed, the secret services will have to call the
police, Granic said.
Secret services in the past years caused dissatisfaction among
citizens, primarily due to the tapping of telephones. The new bill
stipulates that wiretapping requires the consent of a Supreme Court
judge.
The parliamentary Internal affairs and National Security Committee
has suggested that a County Court judge or several judges should
made this decision.
The group who proposed the bill defined the supervision of the
services within the services themselves, as well as through the
National Security Council.
Civilian supervision of the intelligence agencies is an open issue.
The bill leaves it up to the parliament to solve the problem in the
best way possible.
Party benches agreed that the new law should secure efficient
control of the services to avoid the former abuses, and suggested
several ways to do it.
Damir Kajin of the Istrian Democratic Assembly said the
parliament's opposition parties should control the services.
The Social Democratic Party's Ivan Ninic said it is important that
the parliament has decisive control of the services, and suggested
founding a special state body which would answer to the
parliament.
The Croatian Peasants' Party, Ante Markov said, advocates a council
which would be appointed by the parliament, and which would control
the work of intelligence services.
Ivan Jarnjak of the Croatian Democratic Union did not speak in
detail about the nature of the body supervising the services, but
the party bench, he said, is aware of the importance of efficient
control. The bench also insists that the parliament speaker, both
in peace-time and war, be a member of the National Security
Service.
MPs of the ruling party benches were almost unanimous in their
assessment that the situation in the security services, inherited
from the former HDZ rule when they were used for political purposes,
was bad, as was the personnel structure.
MPS said one of the most important problems is tapping telephones
and secret data gathering.
A contract should be signed stipulating that such information
should not be secretly acquired or published, they said. The MPs
also asked what will happen if an agency director does not get
permission from a Supreme Court judge for wiretapping, but such
action has already been undertaken. To whom can citizens complain
if the Supreme Court judge should make the decision, they asked.
The Opposition, the HDZ concretely, warned that the bill does not
solve all outstanding issues.
The law does not have a contingency plan in event that the president
and prime minister do not agree about some reports, decisions or
intelligence service directors, HDZ's Ivan Jarnjak asserted.
Kajin criticised the government, who proposed the bill, of
conspiracy in making up legislation, and claimed the bill is a
product of the government and the president, aimed at control of
power.
(hina) lml sb