RIJEKA: INJURED PARTIES' REPS, ATTORNEYS GIVE CLOSING STATEMENTS RIJEKA, March 17 (Hina) - In the continuation of the trial of the so-called Gospic Group at the Rijeka County Court, representatives of injured parties, i.e. the
families of killed civilians, and the defence attorneys of indictees Stjepan Grandic and Ivica Rozic on Monday made their closing statements.
RIJEKA, March 17 (Hina) - In the continuation of the trial of the so-
called Gospic Group at the Rijeka County Court, representatives of
injured parties, i.e. the families of killed civilians, and the
defence attorneys of indictees Stjepan Grandic and Ivica Rozic on
Monday made their closing statements. #L#
Attorney Ljubisa Drageljevic, representing the families of 18
civilians killed in the Gospic area in the autumn of 1991, said the
killed civilians had been loyal to the Croatian state, they had not
fought against Croatia, and had not committed a single act to bear
responsibility for the death of civilians or members of the
Croatian army. They also did not assist the enemy, he said.
Drageljevic said that the four indictees were not the only ones
responsible for the committed war crimes. Members of the then
government and all subordinated officials had known of the crimes
immediately after they had been committed as well as that they had
been planned, organised and carried out under orders.
An attorney representing eight families of killed civilians,
Slobodan Budak, said the indictees had become "the victims of a
perfidious political act" and that the committed crimes could not
have been their idea. Budak asked why this case had not been
processed nine years ago when everybody knew about it, starting
with the then President, Franjo Tudjman, and the entire state
leadership.
He also mentioned the then State Prosecutor, Zeljko Olujic, and
Justice Minister Bosiljko Misetic, who now act as defence attorneys
of the chief indictee, Tihomir Oreskovic.
Budak said "the Croatian state is definitely responsible" for the
act, since it could have been committed only with the help of the
authorities and the army.
The attorney of defendant Stjepan Grandic, Milenko Skrlec, said
Grandic had not lead masked persons to the liquidation of civilians
at Lipova Glavica on October 18, 1991, nor had he ordered that the
civilians be shot at, for which was indicted.
Skrlec asked for an acquittal for Grandic. Speaking about the
entire process, he said that "one does not win a war by abiding by
the Geneva conventions" because in war "many things are of greater
importance than a Geneva convention" and only those who had started
the war could be held responsible. "You must understand that these
are 'our guys' and had they not been there, who knows if we would
have been here," he told the trial chamber.
Mirko Ruzic, the attorney of Ivica Rozic, a member of the 118th
Gospic Brigade's reconnaissance-sabotage platoon, also requested
acquittal for his client, stating that the prosecution had failed
to establish that Rozic had taken part in the abduction of three
Serbs from Karlobag and their killing.
The trial continues tomorrow with the closing statements of Tihomir
Oreskovic's and Mirko Norac's attorneys.
(hina) lml sb