ZAGREB, April 7 (Hina) - Istrian Democratic Assembly (IDS) Vice-Chairman and member of parliament Damir Kajin told a news conference in Rijeka on Wednesday that the Hague-based UN war crimes tribunal did put Croatia on trial and what
caused and would cause damage to Croatia was the obsession of (the late President Franjo) Tudjman and (former Defence Minister Gojko) Susak to see Croatia within the borders of the 1939 Autonomous Banovina of Croatia.
ZAGREB, April 7 (Hina) - Istrian Democratic Assembly (IDS)
Vice-Chairman and member of parliament Damir Kajin told a news
conference in Rijeka on Wednesday that the Hague-based UN war crimes
tribunal did put Croatia on trial and what caused and would cause
damage to Croatia was the obsession of (the late President Franjo)
Tudjman and (former Defence Minister Gojko) Susak to see Croatia
within the borders of the 1939 Autonomous Banovina of Croatia.#L#
The IDS leader does not believe that the Hague tribunal's indictments
bring into question the legitimacy of the 1995 Storm Operation.
Kajin stressed that it was the fact that Croatia was a victim of the
aggression, but the UN tribunal was also trying to establish whether
or not Croatia's army had been present in Bosnia-Herzegovina before
the Split Agreement and the Washington Agreement.
According to official data, the ICTY's chief prosecutor, Carla del
Ponte, has been for years collecting data on activities of Croatian
Armed Forces' units in Bosnia, Kajin added.
He believes that all sides from the 1990s war should abandon plans to
seek war damages as this would only generate hatred and intolerance,
while the national economies could not survive the payment of
damages.
Commenting on the issue of restitution of property for or compensation
to be paid to Esuli, ethnic Italians who left Croatia in the wake of
the Second World War, Kajin said the real problem included slightly
above 5,000 people who received confirmations that they had been
erased from the lists of persons who had the then Yugoslav citizenship
and whose property was nationalised. Of the said number, only 3,000
had property in the then Yugoslavia and they have now right to ask
restitution of property, Kajin said.
(Hina) ms