INTERN
$ ATIONAL POSITION
ZAGREB, May 25 (Hina) - Croatian President Franjo Tudjman on
Saturday addressed a session of the Presidential Council on the
international position of Croatia.
President Tudjman said that this topic deserved discussion
because of "a lack of understanding and one-sided interpretations"
at home and abroad regarding the process of Croatia's accession to
the Council of Europe. He added that Croatia was faced with
attempts aimed at including it into Balkan integrations.
"In order that this issue, which is of vital importance for
the future of the Croatian state, could be fully understood, I
think that it is necessary to understand the circumstance under
which the independent Croatian state was established, the conduct
of the Homeland War, Croatian policy towards Bosnia-Herzegovina,
Croatian policy towards the Serb population in Croatia and
Yugoslavia, and Croatian relationship with the European Union and
the United States," President Tudjman said.
He said that international factors were trying to
"influence internal political events in Croatia in ways
unprecedented in international relations."
Speaking of the circumstances under which the Croatian
state had been established, President Tudjman recalled that
Yugoslavia had been an important factor of the international order
enjoying support of all major countries, including the European
Union, the United States and Russia. He stressed that any kind of
Yugoslavia had been acceptable to them.
During the Yugoslav crisis, both Western countries and
Belgrade had agreed that Slovenia could leave Yugoslavia but that
Croatia could not.
"The Serb rebellion, the instigating, organizing and arming
of the Serb uprising, did not happen because the independent and
democratic Croatia was a sequel to Pavelic's Independent State of
Croatia (NDH), but because they, Belgrade and Western factors
alike, opposed any independent Croatian state," Tudjman said. Since
the beginning of 1990 and in the summer of 1991, the world tacitly,
if not openly, supported the policy of Belgrade and the Yugoslav
army, and in the autumn of 1991 it expected and wanted the
independent Croatian state to disappear, he said.
"Attempts are again being made to influence Croatia's
destiny," President Tudjman warned.
He pointed out that "all important international factors
were equally categorical against all our decisions," from decisions
about military operations to dismissing UNPROFOR. They had always
come up with the same explanation that such actions prevented peace
efforts by the European Union and the United States of America,
President Tudjman stressed.
"As a regional power, Croatia established partnership with
the U.S.A., enabled it to resume the leading role in ending the
war, and made the Dayton peace agreement possible," President
Tudjman stressed, adding that this caused envy of those factors in
Europe who had failed to resolve the crisis in the region, but also
of those factors in America who could not come to terms with
Croatia's independence".
"The permanently contentious issue is Croatian policy in
Bosnia-Herzegovina, as well as its policy on the internal and
international political scenes," President Tudjman said,
reiterating that "the goal of Croatian policy is to ensure the
existence of Croats in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia's strategic
interests", as well as cooperation and union with Moslems. He
stressed that such policy proved to be "ever so effective and
purposeful".
"With the political and military establishment of the Croat
Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia we ensured the strategic interests of
Croats and the Croatian state, which was the only way to achieve
the Washington Agreement," President Tudjman said, expressing
support for the establishment of the Bosnian Federation and its
connections with Croatia.
He said that "Croatia's policy toward Serbs and Yugoslavia
remains the contentious issue," stressing that the policy towards
the Serb population in Croatia "was and is such as not to confirm
claims that Croatia is the continuation and resurrection of the
Independent State of Croatia in all aspects, even in its policy
toward Serbs. Such claims come from those who do not have good
intentions or who are ignorant".
"We have accepted the peaceful reintegration of the
Croatian Danubian area to show to the world that we support
democratic resolutions, that we do not want all Serbs to leave
Croatia, that
we support the normalization of relations with all states which
emerged on the territory of former Yugoslavia, with Serbia and
Yugoslavia, but we will not accept the idea occurring not only in
some Serbian circles but also in some international circles, that
the Croatian Danubian area, meaning eastern Slavonia, Baranja and
western Srijem, should be given autonomy and that we should accept
some Z-4 Plan in a milder form".
'We do support the normalization of relations with Serbia
and Yugoslavia, for the sake of a stable international order, but
our wish cannot be interpreted as our consent to enter some
regional Balkan associations', President Tudjman said.
He went on to explain reasons for certain attempts 'aimed
at exerting influence on Croatia's internal, political and social
development in a manner unheard of in the history of diplomacy'.
'Where is the problem? Croatia has developed from a
centuries-
long political object into a subject of international politics.
This subject does not fit into plans of some, I dare say, leading
European powers from the time of Versailles until present days, but
also of some U.S. circles which are connected with those European
powers, and which too...cannot come to terms with the idea of a
modern Croatia'.
'As a regional power, Croatia enabled the cessation of war,
it enabled Dayton, but it was also burdened with the task of
breathing life into the Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina, which, as
I said,
is in Croatia's interest, but to some extent also exceeds more
immediate interests of the Croatian national being and state',
President Tudjman said.
'The European Union states - France, Great Britain,
Germany, Italy - they all have their own policies, but they are
unanimous to a large extent as regards their stance towards us.
They are also united in being dissatisfied with the fact that the
United States had played the leading role in the solution of the
Bosnian crisis, as well as with the fact that the United States'
took Croatia's side'.
'That dissatisfaction and the fact that some European
powers only formally accept the Dayton peace agreement, can be seen
in the attempt to compromise the Dayton peace agreement in the case
of Mostar, and at the expense of Croatia'.
'Even the election battle between Democrats and
Republicans, which is being fought in the United States, is having
negative consequences for us, both here in Croatia as well as in
Bosnia-Herzegovina'.
'The European plans aimed at forcing Croatia to stay in the
Balkan regional frameworks in any form, in some kind of Euroslavia,
Adriatic or Balkan confederation or Eastern European union are
supported by certain influential circles in the United States,
which is evident in their Soros-like activities here but not only
in them.
Meetings were being held on the level of major ministries
and bank governors with the aim of integrating Croatia into the ex
Yugoslav area, President Tudjman said, adding that similar
solutions were being applied in the field of European sport. U.S.
representatives are proposing to Croatian Radio-Television that it
'introduce joint programmes with Belgrade, Sarajevo, Skoplje, but
not with, say, Ljubljana or other parts of Europe'.
'My dear colleagues, all this is an everyday practice in
all areas', President Tudjman warned. That practice could be seen
in 'an all-out pressure against Croatia, culminating in the attempt
to destabilize its internal order with all means and, as I said,
with unprecedented diplomatic actions'.
'We are faced with a critique of Croatian democracy from
those factors who have admitted to the Council of Europe such
democratic countries like Albania, Rumania, Moldavia and Russia, at
the same time when those very same factors supported Russia,
allowing it to use tanks against the Parliament and Chechnya'.
'Because of those general international circumstances which
I spoke about, we will accept constructive dialogue and
cooperation, but we will not accept any humiliating conditions',
President
Tudjman stressed. 'One of the main reasons for today's meeting was
for me as the head of the state to make this fact known'.
'Preaching about the immaturity of Croatian democracy is
inappropriate, and Croatian people have to be aware of it'.
'As regards Croatia's current international position, we
should speak in plain words. With all achievements on the
political, economic and military planes, Croatia has gained the
status of a first-class regional factor. Croatia is respected in
international military and financial circles'.
'We have achieved partnership with the United States, the
leading world power', President Tudjman said, adding that attempts
to force Croatia into joining the ex-Yugoslav, Balkan, southeastern
European region caused disagreement between Croatia and main
European factors and some U.S. factors.
'As far as this problem is concerned, I think that we will
have the support of the whole Croatian public when we present our
stance resolutely'.
We support the normalisation of relations between all
states that emerged on the territory of former Yugoslavia and the
Balkan south-eastern European area, but we also want to be
integrated into Central Europe.
By history and culture we belong to that part of Central
Europe which includes Slovenia, Austria, Hungary, Slovakia, the
Czech Republic and Poland. We are part of western European
civilisation and not of eastern European Orthodox civilization.
History has already shown with the two-fold disintegration of
former Yugoslavia that our stance is justified.
It is of utmost importance for the future of Croatian
people and their state that the unity of all national and social-
political forces be established, in the same way other nations did
it in the past and are doing it today', President Tudjman
concluded.
(hina) mm jn vm lm rm
252158 MET may 96
Rubio izvršio pritisak na Panamu zbog kineskog utjecaja na Panamski kanal
Državni vrh čestistao hrvatskim rukometašima
Šah: Pobjednik Praggnanandhaa
Jacobsen: Igrali smo fantastičan rukomet od prvog do posljednjeg dana
Panamski predsjednik isključio raspravu o pitanju Panamskog kanala
Frigan golom u 89. donio pobjedu Westerlou
AEK s 2-1 kao gost pobijedio PAOK
Duvnjak: Bila je privilegija, čast i odgovornost nositi ovaj dres
Izraelska vojska sravnila 20 zgrada u izbjegličkom kampu na Zapadnoj obali
SKV: Hrvatska u 21 sat