ZAGREB FOR MURDER OF EMINENT CROATIAN EMIGRANT ZAGREB, Nov 9 (Hina) - On the first day of the main hearing in the Vinko Sindicic trial at the Zagreb County Court on Tuesday, the defendant denied murdering eminent Croatian political
emigrant Bruno Busic. Sindicic is charged with murdering Busic in Paris on 16 October 1978 at an order and in the organisation of the SDS, a former Yugoslav national security service. Even though he claimed he would stand mute, the defendant today on several occasions commented on the investigation and allegations made in the indictment. Sindicic said he had an alibi that he had not killed Busic, and asserted there was neither evidence nor witnesses who could confirm he was the murderer. Data on the murder should be searched among persons who took part in "Croatian Spring", a democratic movement from 1971, and who after its suppression continued working for Yugoslav secret services, he said. The defendant claimed he h
ZAGREB, Nov 9 (Hina) - On the first day of the main hearing in the
Vinko Sindicic trial at the Zagreb County Court on Tuesday, the
defendant denied murdering eminent Croatian political emigrant
Bruno Busic.
Sindicic is charged with murdering Busic in Paris on 16 October 1978
at an order and in the organisation of the SDS, a former Yugoslav
national security service.
Even though he claimed he would stand mute, the defendant today on
several occasions commented on the investigation and allegations
made in the indictment.
Sindicic said he had an alibi that he had not killed Busic, and
asserted there was neither evidence nor witnesses who could confirm
he was the murderer.
Data on the murder should be searched among persons who took part in
"Croatian Spring", a democratic movement from 1971, and who after
its suppression continued working for Yugoslav secret services, he
said.
The defendant claimed he had been subjected to frequent threats
made through "various channels" since the early 1990s, when he was
serving in Scotland a 15-year sentence for the attempted murder of
Croatian political emigrant Nikola Stedul. The threats have
continued since his custody in Zagreb, he said.
Asked by panel of judges president Damir Kos who threatened him and
how, Sindicic said Stedul "threatened me through the media", while
newly elected Constitutional Court judge Vice Vukojevic did so
"through a 'connection'." He added Bozo Vukusic, present in court,
had also threatened him.
Judge Kos then removed Vukusic, as a possible witness, out of the
court. Reporters learned from defence attorney Tihomir Rubesa that
Vukusic was an adviser and researcher at the Commission for the
Research of Victims of the War and Post-War Period, whose deputy
chairman is Vukojevic.
Sindicic said Vukusic "was manipulated by some people" who wanted
Sindicic to be a "scapegoat." He added he had also been threatened
by another person who he declined to name at present.
Since the defendant opted for standing mute, Judge Kos read the
statements which Sindicic made to the investigating judge on three
occasions. In the first one, which contains a long biography, the
defendant said that at the time of the Busic murder, he had been in a
Paris cafe, while in the third statement he denied the first one and
said he had not been in Paris at all.
Sindicic said in his statement that Busic had been mistakenly
murdered by Jozo Milos, who was supposed to murder a diplomat. He
stated he had met Busic in Paris in 1969, and that he had never
contacted him afterwards.
County State Attorney Radovan Santek turned down a request the
defence made yesterday for the exemption of Deputy County State
Attorney Ivica Ovcar from the trial.
The panel of judges accepted the prosecution's request for the
interrogation of about 30 witnesses named in the indictment and
interrogated during investigation.
The main hearing will resume on 15 November, with statements from
the first prosecution witnesses.
(hina) ha jn