SARAJEVO, July 8 (Hina) - The final agreement on the border line between Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina reached at a meeting of the interstate diplomatic commission in Zagreb was brought into question on Thursday when the Serb side in
Bosnia insisted on the change of the already established frontier near Kostajnica on the Una river. A co-chairman of the Bosnian Ministerial Council, Svetozar Mihajlovic, on Thursday said in Sarajevo that Bosnian Serbs insisted on the exchange of territory between the two countries in that part where the border line intersected the Una river passing from one bank to the other.
SARAJEVO, July 8 (Hina) - The final agreement on the border line
between Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina reached at a meeting of the
interstate diplomatic commission in Zagreb was brought into
question on Thursday when the Serb side in Bosnia insisted on the
change of the already established frontier near Kostajnica on the
Una river.
A co-chairman of the Bosnian Ministerial Council, Svetozar
Mihajlovic, on Thursday said in Sarajevo that Bosnian Serbs
insisted on the exchange of territory between the two countries in
that part where the border line intersected the Una river passing
from one bank to the other. #L#
The Ministerial Council discussed the Zagreb border agreement and
concluded that the document could not be forwarded to Bosnia's
Parliament for ratification due to Serb objections.
"We would like that Una will be also a natural border line between
Croatia and Bosnia when it becomes navigable," Mihajlovic said.
He assessed that in case of the swap of territory all interested
parties would do the same concessions.
The other co-chairman of the Council, Haris Silajdzic, openly
expressed opposition to Bosnian Serb demands.
"We should be clear, it is about the demand to change the state
borders. In case the establishment of natural border lines is
requested, we shall never sign border agreements with neighbouring
states," Silajdzic said.
According to Silajdzic, the only acceptable solution is to sign
this agreement forged by the interstate diplomatic commission and
after that agreements on the exchange of small parts of territory
may be possible if it is in the interest of both countries.
Mihajlovic, however, insisted that all borders between republics
in the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRJ) had
been administrative boundaries while state frontiers should be now
established.
We differ in the opinion whether we have a state border or not. I
think we have the state border, Silajdzic responded to Mihajlovic
in front of reporters.
(hina) jn ms