ZAGREB, Oct 11 (Hina) - The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) parliamentary bench decided at a session on Friday to insist on its proposal that the parliament next week discuss changes to the Constitutional Law on Cooperation Between
Croatia and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY).
ZAGREB, Oct 11 (Hina) - The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ)
parliamentary bench decided at a session on Friday to insist on its
proposal that the parliament next week discuss changes to the
Constitutional Law on Cooperation Between Croatia and the
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY).
#L#
Party whip Vladimir Seks told reporters the bench insisted that the
parliament also discuss a proposal by the Social Liberals (HSLS)
that the government be bound to introduce a moratorium on decisions
on the hand-over of indictees to the Hague-based tribunal until the
Constitutional Court makes a decision on the matter.
Seks also believes that the Constitutional Court should be
requested to voice its opinion about the constitutionality of
indictments against generals Ante Gotovina and Rahim Ademi as it
will do "in case of General Janko Bobetko".
"We believe that a discussion about these topics will not
jeopardise the government's legal efforts before the tribunal nor
its political efforts to seek understanding for its position," Seks
said.
He stated that a serious and well-argumented parliamentary debate
would not jeopardise Bobetko's defence but strengthen Croatia's
position and his defence.
At yesterday's session of the parliament presidency, which was also
attended by party whips and Prime Minister Ivica Racan and his
deputy Goran Granic, it was decided that the HDZ and the HSLS decide
before today's parliamentary sitting if they would continue to
insist on their requests.
The HSLS did not voice its opinion by the start of the session, which
was delayed due to consultations in party benches.
The ruling coalition yesterday stated that a debate on the matter
would be counter-productive and that there was no sense in
discussing changes to the Constitutional Law because that would
create an impression that Croatia was distancing itself from
dialogue and cooperation with the tribunal.
(hina) rml sb