LJUBLJANA, Aug 9 (Hina) - The dialogue of Slovene and Croatiandiplomats, and the protest notes exchanged in connection with the seaborder in the northern Adriatic received extensive coverage in Slovenenewspapers on Monday.
LJUBLJANA, Aug 9 (Hina) - The dialogue of Slovene and Croatian
diplomats, and the protest notes exchanged in connection with the sea border in
the northern Adriatic received extensive coverage in Slovene newspapers on
Monday.
Maribor's Vecer and Ljubljana's Delo said last week's meeting of the
Croatian-Slovene commission for border area cooperation had been unsuccessful
because Slovenia could not agree to the renewal of a fishing code in the border
area on the condition that Slovene police boats should not cross a demarcation
line cutting through the middle of Piran Bay.
According to Slovene media, Croatia proposed splitting the bay in two and
is trying to impose the line running across the middle. Although the U.N.
Convention on the Law of the Sea stipulates that such a line is valid if there
is no bilateral agreement, Slovenia finds this unacceptable.
Delo says that under international law, such a demarcation line does not
apply if there exist special historic or other circumstances, which it adds do
exist in the case of Piran Bay because Slovenia always managed the bay's
tourism, economy and ecology. Delo says Slovene police had complete control of
the bay on 25 June 1991, which it adds is a crucial date for all border-related
issues. This, the daily goes on to say, has made Piran Bay "part of Slovenia's
internal waters" where, unlike in "territorial waters", states have the same
rights of action as on land.
Vecer's Boris Jausovec wonders who is benefitting from this year's fishing
incidents and why the fishing code, which went out of force when Slovenia
joined the European Union in May, was not extended earlier, since both sides'
diplomats claim they want good neighbourly relations and the European spirit in
coming to agreement. Jausovec wonders if Slovenia's autumn elections are to
blame or the fact that the tensions at sea serve the non-European mentality of
both states' politicians.