"The show was obviously tendentious and contrary to all journalistic standards, as was the show over which (reporter) Tihomir Ladisic was dismissed, when it was tendentiously stated that Croats attacked Sarajevo together with Chetnik units," Seks said.
He added that the parliament, as the highest legislative body, had to address the issue, which he said was not about exerting influence on media freedoms.
"Freedom of the media does not mean disseminating historical forgeries in a brazen and disgusting way," Seks said.
The parliamentary debate on "Latinica" was prompted by Pejo Trgovcevic of the Party of Rights (HSP), who urged Croatian Radio Television (HRT) director Mirko Galic to comment on the broadcast discussing the legacy of the first Croatian president Franjo Tudjman.
Trgovcevic claimed that the broadcast depicted Tudjman and the Croatian people as criminals and the Croatian state as one founded on crime.
HRT director Galic said the broadcast was done unprofessionally and that competent HRT bodies would state their position on the matter.
"We have a rule on HTV, which is that we can speak about everything openly, but not in a superficial, biased and tendentious way, which is what happened last night," Galic said.