ZAGREB, Nov 4 (Hina) - The current legal framework regulating +electronic media activity in Croatia is an obstacle to the creation +and enforcement of a coherent broadcasting policy, which has +resulted in less pluralism and a slowed
growth of cable radio and +television stations.+ This evaluation was made by Council of Europe media experts in a +report on Croatia's final bill on changes and amendments to the Law +on Croatia Radio-Television (HRT), which the Organisation for +Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) mission in Croatia +forwarded to the Croatian government and parliament last week.+ The report was made by Karol Jakubowitz, deputy chairman of the +Permanent Committee for Television Without Frontiers at the +Council of Europe, at a request of Croatian parliament vice +president Vladimir Seks.+ According to Jakubowitz, "there is effective stat
ZAGREB, Nov 4 (Hina) - The current legal framework regulating
electronic media activity in Croatia is an obstacle to the creation
and enforcement of a coherent broadcasting policy, which has
resulted in less pluralism and a slowed growth of cable radio and
television stations.
This evaluation was made by Council of Europe media experts in a
report on Croatia's final bill on changes and amendments to the Law
on Croatia Radio-Television (HRT), which the Organisation for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) mission in Croatia
forwarded to the Croatian government and parliament last week.
The report was made by Karol Jakubowitz, deputy chairman of the
Permanent Committee for Television Without Frontiers at the
Council of Europe, at a request of Croatian parliament vice
president Vladimir Seks.
According to Jakubowitz, "there is effective state monopoly of
nation-wide broadcasting" in Croatia.
He recommends the "creation of an autonomous Broadcasting and
Telecommunications Council (...) serving the public interest
instead of narrow political or administrative interests."
To achieve this it is necessary to change the legal framework, as
neither the current Law on HRT, nor the final bill on changes and
amendments to it, allow for this possibility, Jakubowitz said in
the report.
Speaking about the said bill, adopted by the Croatian Upper House
without insight into his report, the Council of Europe official
stated that only a small number of amendments were compliant with
recommendations made by the Council's media experts. Jakubowitz
said many more important changes were necessary.
Article 1 of the final bill claims HRT has been founded for the sake
of broadcasting programmes of importance for the Republic.
Jakubowitz believes this could serve as an excuse for state control
of the programmes of an undisputably public institution.
The excuse for a daily programme control may likewise be derived
from the claim that HRT is "owned by the Republic of Croatia", said
Jakubowitz.
The final bill's Article 12 states that one Council of Europe
recommendation has been adopted, in the part suggesting that
"representatives of Parliament should constitute a minority (10
out of 24) of HRT Council members."
What is not good, according to Jakubowitz, is the fact that the
parliament will continue to have the right of vetoing the
appointment of public figures into the HRT Council.
According to the report, another weakness in the final bill is the
fact that the HRT Council's powers have not been extended
sufficiently, especially the fact that the HRT Council will not
have the right to appoint a general director, a matter under the
parliament's jurisdiction.
Jakubowitz however commended the final bill's proposal that the HRT
Council appoint editors-in-chief of both radio and television who
cannot be party officials.
OSCE spokesman Mark Thompson said last week that Jakubowitz's
assessments should be of use during a parliamentary debate on the
final bill, drafted by the bench of the ruling Croatian Democratic
Union (HDZ).
Since the final bill has been adopted, the OSCE mission forwarded
the Council of Europe report to the government and the parliament
for possible future discussions.
(hina) ha